Menu

Title

Subtitle

Cast Metal End With Throw Metal Guttering

The headlines that the brand new place house for Rowan Atkinson has been accepted by the Oxfordshire Planning Committee despite being suggested for refusal by the Authority's Planning Officers is in danger of increasing again the instead drained question about Modernism versus Classicism in the English countryside. But this really is totally the wrong debate. Dragging out the 2 old conflict horses onto the jousting areas of Heart Britain is displacement task that takes the interest away from a far more pushing, modern question affecting European tradition more generally that would be broadcast if the war-horses could be put back their stables for a while.

Atkinson's planning consultant Terence O'Rourke is reported as explaining the brand new proposals as 'a piece of 21st century large architecture' ;.I am maybe not certain that this is a valuable or entirely exact information of the proposals. It's true that Atkinson's architect for the home, Richard Meier, produced over from the US to do this his first creating in the UK, is a respectable architect however practicing in the home roofing service 21st century but the ideas that produce his function are strongly seated in the first the main last century. The home can therefore equally be described as a piece of 20th century architecture or as a piece of 'Old Modernism' ;.

Old Modernism

The ideas that Meier however employs this season were new in the 1920's and 30's when Le Corbusier and different early leaders of the Modern Motion produced an architecture that stated the heart of a technology coming from the first earth war. This technology instead naively believed that they might wipe clean the record of record and build a daring new world. Corb's polemical connection of the architecture was defined in his popular 'Five Points for a New Architecture', first published as some articles in the diary he produced, titled 'L'Espirit Nouveau' ;.These five items set up powerful polemical dichotomies, purposefully disparaging of the old buy; the brand new architecture was to stand elegantly over the ground on thin 'pilotis' (columns) rather than over moist and rat infested basements, the columned framework could produce the 'Free plan' and supersede the constraints of large load-bearing structures using their uncomfortable edges, raising the houses down the ground on pilotis could produce 'free ground' in the town to restore the congested streets. The architectural body could as well as releasing up the program produce the 'free elevation' and the characteristic outside reel windows of the era. Finally, what Corb argued were the useless dark roof places related to old-fashioned pitched roofs could be replaced by the 'roof garden' the sixth of Le Corbusier's five points. The other principal characteristic of the architecture that curiously does not get stated as one of many five items is it is 'white' ;.The whiteness enabled that architecture to deny the materiality of the building's surfaces. The materials are therefore seen as ideal abstractions, conceptual cases which find to establish probably unlimited space. The problems of a real material could undermine the search for a natural statement of utter space, and therefore material it self had to join these repressed aspects of architecture's reality.

Needless to say these aspects of architecture's truth that in these five items were condemned by Le Corbusier didn't get away. Indeed following the 2nd World Conflict, Le Corbusier's own architecture took a significant change of direction. By enough time he was developing Masions Jaoul in Paris the 1950's the five items have been abandoned. The piloti had disappeared, in a way that the houses sat steadily on the ground. The properties received load displaying structures, thus decreasing the consequences of the 'free plan' and 'free elevation' and at the same time the roofs were vaulted therefore questioning the accessible 'roof garden' ;.Actually the 'whiteness' that rejected the houses materiality had disappeared to be replaced by 'Beton brut', a fresh and excessive kind of architectural materiality that appeared to be named from Le Corbusier's psyche to harmony the earlier denial.

The Small Old Defend:

While we can see that Le Corbusier was able to move on from the excessive polemic of early modernism, the seeds of the architectural language that he had helped to produce have been sown and were later to be picked up uncritically by way of a new generation. Richard Meier was portion of the new generation. He emerged as you of several young architects working in New York in the 1960's who came to international interest in 1967 subsequent an exhibition of these just work at the Memorial of Modern Artwork prepared by Arthur Drexler and later published in a guide presenting the work of 'The New York Five'; Chris Eisenman, Jordan Graves, Charles Gwathmey, Steve Hejduk and Richard Meier. In those days that group to some degree discussed the reductive language of the first modern movement but even though some were later to go in to new territory, Meier presented the line. "If I can't be Le Corbusier, then I could be Richard Meier", I seem to recall him saying in the first times of his career, and in a recently available page to the Oxfordshire Planning Team he's now obviously claiming the territory as his own, "Whiteness is one of many characteristic characteristics of my work...." ;.

It's now seventy or eighty decades considering that the removed, architectural language of modernism first surfaced on the mainland of Europe. To some extent it's since then been assimilated by modern culture. In the commercial earth, the material and glass system is now the established sort for corporate headquarters in our cities but with a few significant conditions on the domestic front their authority is less evident. In the domestic earth modernism has been largely limited by the design of kitchens or toilet interiors, it's seldom been allowed onto the High Street. The issue that needs to be asked is just why the retention of modernism has been therefore incomplete and why does that reductive architecture continue to provoke such vehement reactions; the planning officer's in their recommendation to refuse planning permission for Rowan Atkinson's house branded the system an "ugly space age petrol station." Such inarticulate sentiments are a damning indictment of the English planning system; but when we can forgive them their childlike outbursts it really shows, just much like The King of Wales' 'Carbuncle' and 'Authorities Academy' comments, a discomfort with something which they cannot put effectively in to words. I'd like to see if I can help them.

Go Back

Comment

Blog Search

Comments

There are currently no blog comments.